GalChimia customers come from several industries, but the majority can be classified into two categories: agrochemical and pharmaceutical.

What are the differences and the similarities between these two sectors?

Pharmaceuticals and pesticides undergo a similar development and registration process, and they also share certain aspects of risk management. Indeed, both are chemical compounds that can have adverse effects and, if misused, will have detrimental effects on human health and/or the environment.
Leads for pharmaceuticals and pesticides often overlap, in some cases resulting in similar compounds being used for human health and weed management purposes. The following figures show similar structures issued from pharmaceuticals or agrochemicals:

Several pesticides have also been reported to act against certain diseases:


  1. The market

The main discrepancies between the two products are market size and final price. Pharmaceuticals are sold to the final consumer but also through a public health system with health insurance to cover most of the fees. The cost of crop protection is entirely paid by the farmer. He will also need to treat large areas of land, requiring large quantities of the product. The agrochemical market is defined by the amount of money that can be spent by the farmers. More specifically, looking at the price:

  • A common pesticide product: Glyphosate (marketed by Monsanto as Roundup), can be bought for 2,000 USD per tonne.
  • A common pharmaceutical product: Ibuprofen, can be bought for 5 to 10 USD per 10 tablets (or 2g of product). The cost per tonne would be near 5 million USD.

The sales of the largest players of each industry are drastically different. Pharma revenues are 5 to 10 times higher than those from Agro.
Figures for 2015
When considered only the sales relating to the market of interest (not the company’s overall sales)
Data found on Agropage and Statistas

  1. The R&D process

Taking into account these cost limitations we can look at the R&D expenditure. In 2012 the Pharma sector spent around 135 billion USD, while spending in the agrochemical sector reached 6.7 billion USD. What is the difference between the two industries? Where is Agro is spending less than Pharma?

Starting from the beginning, the early stage process for discovering new pesticides or new drugs is very similar. Usually, a target or a mechanism of action is identified and a screening is performed with a library of chemical compounds. The physicochemical parameters used by industry as an initial estimate of the probability of a molecule being a good pharmaceutical or pesticide are very similar. In fact, the 20 most common chemical side chains of pharmaceutical molecules are the same as those for pesticides and are found in about the same relative frequency. The molecular weight range of pesticides and pharmaceuticals is also very similar. Perhaps the primary difference between pesticides and pharmaceuticals involves economics. Molecules that are costly to synthesize (more than one chiral center) are generally precluded from the pesticide market, whereas the pharmaceutical market can bear more expensive molecules.

Regarding the toxicology, testing is quite similar: acute and chronic testing, reproductive and developmental toxicity, mutagenicity and others specific testing that will depend on the molecule properties. Both have to perform an Environmental Risk Assessment. Similarly, metabolites and impurities have to be controlled and tested if they are above a threshold.

Certainly the main difference in term of R&D cost is at the clinical stage. Pharmaceutical has to run long clinical study in humans over several years, representing more than 50% of the overall cost of R&D, whereas molecules for crop protection the Field Trial represent around 15% of the overall cost of development.

  1. Conclusion


As a conclusion, the two main differences are focused on finding a very low-cost synthesis process and the clinical trials. However, for many years, virtually all pharmaceutical companies had an agrochemical division. This was partly to maximize the benefits of expensive chemical synthesis efforts by searching for many types of useful biological activity. Are pesticides luxurious pharmaceuticals? I don’t think so, but when I began writing this editorial I did not expect so many similarities.